Every advisor who has ever glanced at the WealthTech landscape map has had the same thought: if I could start fresh, what would I actually choose?

Most never get to find out. They inherit a tech stack from their broker-dealer, bolt on a few tools over the years, and live with the result. But a growing number of advisors --- driven by industry consolidation, the rise of the independent RIA model, and the desire for more control --- are now facing that question for real.

Adam Spiegelman is one of them. After leaving his broker-dealer in the wake of a major acquisition, Adam launched Spiegelman Wealth Management as an independent RIA and had to build his entire technology ecosystem from scratch. His experience offers a practical, unvarnished look at what that process actually involves.

The silver platter problem

Before going independent, Adam was at a broker-dealer that invested heavily in technology --- reportedly hundreds of people working on proprietary systems, with a technology budget rumored to be in the hundreds of millions.

"Their CRM was all custom. The trading platform was terrific. You could call up the technology department and put a suggestion in, a request for something, and they would do it a lot of the time," Adam recalled. "It was very flexible. They would make changes on the fly just for you."

That level of service set a high bar. But it also created a dependency. When advisors at platform-centric broker-dealers go independent, they do not just lose a brand name. They lose an entire integrated technology infrastructure that someone else maintained, updated, and customized for them.

"Commonwealth kind of did everything. Put it on a silver platter for us," Adam said. "And the most difficult part --- well, the fun part is choosing. But it's kind of integrating everything together."

This is the reality that catches most newly independent advisors off guard. The challenge is not selecting individual tools. It is making them all talk to each other.

Starting with what you know

Adam took a pragmatic approach to building his stack. Rather than starting from zero, he went direct with many of the same vendors he had used through his broker-dealer.

"I used a lot of the same technology that we had used at Commonwealth. I just went direct with the vendor," he explained.

This is a smart strategy for advisors in transition. Going independent introduces enough change without simultaneously learning entirely new software. Start with the tools you know, go direct with those vendors, and then evaluate alternatives once you are settled.

The core components Adam prioritized:

• Custodian platform (Fidelity)

• Portfolio management and reporting (Black Diamond)

• Financial planning software

• CRM

• Scheduling tools (Calendly)

These are the table stakes --- the systems every independent advisor needs from day one.

The overwhelming middle: navigating the WealthTech landscape

Once the basics were in place, Adam turned to the categories he had not previously needed to think about. At a broker-dealer, document management, compliance tools, and other operational infrastructure were handled for you. As an independent, every one of those categories becomes your responsibility.

"I kind of looked under the covers or the hood. I started to go deep into some of that and it got a little overwhelming," Adam admitted. "I did a few demos here and there."

The WealthTech landscape map --- with its hundreds of vendors across dozens of categories --- is both a blessing and a curse for newly independent advisors. It represents an unprecedented level of choice. It also represents a potentially paralyzing amount of evaluation work.

Adam's approach: focus on the foundation first (custodian, portfolio management, planning, CRM), then systematically evaluate the add-ons. Accept that some decisions will be imperfect. You can always switch later.

"You've got to kind of pick something and run with it," he said. "And if it's around in a couple years, that's probably the hard part --- navigating the technology."

The integration challenge: where the real work lives

Choosing tools is the visible part of building a tech stack. Integration is the invisible part --- and it is where most of the ongoing pain lives.

At a broker-dealer with hundreds of technology employees, integrations are maintained behind the scenes. Data flows between systems. Reports pull from multiple sources. Workflows trigger across platforms. Advisors see none of this plumbing. They just see it working.

As an independent, you suddenly own all of that plumbing.

"You've got to have a very strong IT provider or someone that kind of understands all that integration," Adam emphasized.

This is the gap that trips up most independent advisors. You can have the best CRM, the best portfolio management tool, and the best financial planning software --- but if they do not talk to each other, you are manually moving data between systems. That means more time on operations and less time with clients.

The firms that solve this problem well tend to take one of two approaches:

1. Hire or contract with a dedicated technology consultant who understands the WealthTech ecosystem and can manage integrations.

2. Adopt a unified data layer that connects all of your systems into a single infrastructure, eliminating the need to manage dozens of point-to-point integrations yourself.

Either way, the key insight is this: budgeting for technology is not just about software licenses. It is about the time and expertise required to make those systems work together.

The surprises: AI and the depth of modern tools

When asked what surprised him most about building his tech stack, Adam pointed to two things.

First, AI-powered meeting tools. "Some of the AI stuff --- it actively listens to the meeting and gives you a summary of the call. It's really, really good for documentation, for prepping for meetings in the future."

Second, the sheer depth of his portfolio management platform. "I didn't realize that the learning curve is not even just kind of like this --- it's almost vertical. There are so many variables, in a good way. But you've got to have an expert that understands it really well."

Both of these surprises point to a broader truth about modern WealthTech: the tools available to independent advisors today are more powerful than anything that existed five years ago. But power comes with complexity. And complexity requires either expertise or infrastructure to manage effectively.

The conference trap

Adam raised another challenge that resonates with many advisors: the constant stream of new technology options.

"I went to a conference a few months ago and we had this breakout session on AI. There are dozens of players out there. Which one's going to be the winner? Which one's going to rise to the top? How are they going to support this?"

This is the conference trap. Every event introduces new vendors, new categories, and new shiny objects. For independent advisors who are already stretched thin managing their practice and their technology, the temptation to constantly evaluate and switch tools can become a distraction.

The antidote: establish your core stack, commit to it for a reasonable period (12-18 months), and resist the urge to chase every new entrant. Technology should serve your practice, not consume it.

"You didn't go and start an RIA to become a technology expert," as the saying goes. "But you have to have technology to support you as you grow."

The real cost of building from scratch

When broker-dealers invest hundreds of millions in technology, they are not being frivolous. They are acknowledging the true cost of building and maintaining integrated technology infrastructure.

Independent advisors do not have that kind of budget. But they face the same fundamental challenge: making multiple systems work together to create a seamless experience for both the advisor and the client.

The costs that most advisors underestimate:

• Time spent evaluating vendors --- easily 100-200 hours during the transition

• Integration setup and maintenance --- ongoing, often requiring specialized help

• Learning curves --- weeks or months to become proficient with new tools

• Opportunity cost --- every hour spent on technology is an hour not spent with clients

• Contract lock-in risk --- signing annual contracts before fully understanding a tool's limitations

The advisors who navigate this best are the ones who plan for these costs up front, rather than discovering them mid-transition.

What the best independent tech stacks have in common

After talking with dozens of advisors who have built their tech stacks from scratch, a pattern emerges. The best stacks share three characteristics:

1. A strong foundation. Custodian, portfolio management, CRM, and financial planning are locked in and working before anything else gets added.

2. A plan for integration. Whether through a technology consultant, a unified data platform, or careful API planning, the best stacks have a deliberate strategy for making systems talk to each other.

3. Restraint. The best stacks are not the ones with the most tools. They are the ones where every tool earns its place and the advisor actually uses its full capabilities.

As Adam said about his portfolio management platform: "I've only kind of tapped the surface of that, but there are so many nuances and variables. Blessing and a curse, but you can do so much."

The best technology strategy for an independent advisor is not to have the most tools. It is to go deep with the right ones.

This article is based on a conversation between Kyle Van Pelt and Adam Spiegelman on the Next Mile podcast. Adam is the founder of Spiegelman Wealth Management.

For more conversations with advisors building the future of independent wealth management, subscribe to the Next Mile podcast on YouTube or your favorite podcast platform.

Want insights like this delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the Rising Tide newsletter for weekly perspectives on WealthTech, practice management, and the independent advisor movement.